There have been a lot of stories lately about the importance of location, or lack thereof, to an Internet company's success. Pascal Zachary wrote a New York Times piece recently entitled "PING: When it Comes to Innovation, Geography is Destiny" where, essentially, he argued that Silicon Valley' is the place to be if you want your venture to succeed. Tom Foremski, In his post yesterday, went as far as saying that "Silicon Valley is rapidly turning into Media Valley--and New York, NY should look out--the capital of the media world is shifting about 3,000 miles westwards." Come on.
A number of people have argued for and against the theory that location, particularly being in Silicon Valley, is a key success factor. While the debate is interesting, I'm not going to rehearse in detail the arguments in support (e.g. Silicon Valley gives greater access to engineering talent, money, magic, etc.) and against (e.g. Skype didn't come from the Valley; there's less Kool Aid drinking elsewhere, etc.).
What I will say is that location can enable a company to foster a certain type of culture. That culture can shine through the company's products and image, and it can be a key ingredient of success.
Wired ran a piece last week called "Web Startups Reboot 'London 2.0'" that detailed the city's burgeoning tech venture scene. In it, Martin Stiksel, co-founder of Last.fm (which is rumored to be entertaining a $450 million buy out offer from Viacom), praised his company's East End location, saying "if Last.fm would have started in Silicon Valley, it would already be very derivative and bland like most of the projects coming from (that) part of the world. It's great to be here." While that is a broad generalization and maybe a bit defiantly Euro-centric, there's definitely some truth in it. In fact, at least where digital music is concerned, it reminds me of my own experience.
My first venture, Cductive, was an early online music retailer of mp3 downloads and custom CDs. We started in a tenement apartment in New York's Lower East Side in January 1997 (when it was a lot different than today). We bootstrapped and angel-funded the company's development over three years until we sold to main rival eMusic, a company then based in Silicon Valley which was publicly traded and had raised about $120 million in private and public equity. Clearly, both companies were too early.
At Cductive, we had a group of hip, young, modestly paid employees who lived and breathed music. Even our lead programmer, Bing, was an accomplished DJ. We worked in a open warehouse loft, where music blared loudly and continuously. We went out to clubs until late to see bands and mingle with artists and indie label folks. Our site was edgy - black in color with a cobra as our logo. This culture was created partly by design, partly because of limited funding, and partly because we were based in New York. We signed up hundreds of labels without big advance payments, largely because we knew them and their music. They felt comfortable dealing with like-minded people.
Although eMusic was probably the best known first wave digital music retailer and helped kick start the digital music revolution, they were cut from the typical Silicon Valley start-up cloth. They were overly funded (like most ventures back then) and housed in luxurious but sterile corporate offices in Redwood City, CA. They had some very talented people, but, at its core, it was a tech company - with a tech company culture. In fact, the only time I heard "music" in their offices was when someone said the company name. That was eMusic 1.0. The company is now headquartered in New York and owned by Dimensional Associates (which bought it on the cheap from Vivendi Universal a few years ago). Now that digital music is mainstream, portability has been solved through the iPod, and the company has continued our original focus on open mp3 (which provides complete interoperability), eMusic is now doing quite well. It's the #2 music download site after Apple's iTunes Music Store.
eMusic certainly went through ups and downs and was always bigger than Cductive. However, Cductive would never have gotten as far as it did on a slim budget -- to compete with eMusic so effectively that they had to buy us -- without a street-smart, music obsessed-team and a left-of-center culture. I feel that we were able to craft that culture in large part due to our downtown New York location. So, when I hear Last.fm credit their edgy East End home as an ingredient of success, I understand. In fact, besides strong traffic and community, perhaps it's partly their cool image and hipster appeal that Viacom sees in them. After all, isn't that what MTV had going for it early on?

Particularly like the Redwood City location link. Class.
Posted by: Shane | March 07, 2007 at 01:24 PM
Great (and relevant) post. Agree the links to Wikipedia are nice touch. Fun to compare and contrast history and culture between LES/East End and Redwood City.
Posted by: David Porter | March 15, 2007 at 07:35 AM
am a musician i need someone to sign a record deal with.hip hop artis
Posted by: david | July 02, 2008 at 10:35 AM
Bing??? an accomplished DJ???/ he do music???? jajaja well i know the music is different person gto person but Bing never do music, the name of Bing is on the market because he sold it himself, but he is nt even a DJ
Posted by: Social Anxiety Disorder | March 21, 2009 at 08:04 AM
After all, isn't that what MTV had going for it early on?
jajaja so true... why we dont talk about your dog or the pretty nice of your mustache something of noone of us know yet!!!!
Posted by: Free Affiliate Program | March 21, 2009 at 08:07 AM
I am pleased to say it is interesting that this blog has a great variety of viewpoints to better understand the situation and that is what most caught my attention and has a great variety of comments
Posted by: Antique Autos | October 30, 2009 at 05:14 PM